Mars vs Venus: leaders aligned on business, differ on diversity

by |

diversity(1).jpg" style="width: 102px; height: 70px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 5px; float: left;" />We can discuss the differences between men and women all day without many answers, but it seems women and men still disagree about what causes the shortage of women on company boards.

A new report from global organisation WomenCorporateDirectors (WCD) found 45% of men said the "lack of women in executive ranks" was the primary reason that the percentage of women on boards isn't increasing, while only 18% of women agreed. Female respondents said the fact that traditional networks tended to be male-oriented was a concern.

There was a clear perception gap when it came to evaluating how the still predominantly male business networks impacted upon the number of women on boards, Susan Stautberg from WCD said. "Women see a real need to develop the kinds of networks that have historically been the path to directorships. These more diverse networks will create greater success for the company."

The organisation surveyed more than 1,000 directors around the world and found both genders agreed on economic outlook, political and regulatory concerns, and the business challenges facing their companies.

There was a remarkable consensus among men and women directors globally regarding the top 2012 political issues and the threat of increased regulation in this turbulent economy, Stautberg said. "But there is far less agreement from men and women in the area of board diversity. Women believe that board leaders must actively work to bring more women onto boards, while men see the lack of board diversity equally as a pipeline issue.”

The report found that:


  • More than half (57%) of respondents did not see diversity as a top priority for their board.
  • One-third (35%) of respondents said their boards had adopted measures that successfully advanced diversity on the board.
  • Just over one-half (51%) of the women directors surveyed believed that quotas are an effective tool for increasing diversity in the boardroom, but only 25% of men agreed.

One area of agreement was in how men and women rate their personal strength — or lack there of — in CEO succession planning, Stautberg said. Only 1% of women and 0% of men rated succession planning as their strongest area of board expertise.

Although finding the next generation of leadership was critical to the health and prosperity of an organisation, only 40% of respondents globally said their boards had an effective succession planning process for directors, she said.


Top News:

Major failure on change initiatives - what's going on?

The tide is changing on social media: survey

Know your employees and reap the dividends


Most Discussed:

Narrow-minded assumptions could lead to loss of best candidates

Time to lift the lid on employee salaries

HR worst at leaving personal life at home

HRD Forum is the place for positive industry interaction and welcomes your professional and informed opinion.

Name (required)
Comment (required)
By submitting, I agree to the Terms & Conditions