AFFCO explains Employment Court appeal

The meat processor claims the decision goes against 30 years of “well established” law in New Zealand.

AFFCO New Zealand has spoken out about a recent Employment Court decision that didn’t go in the company’s favour, claiming it contradicts decades of well-established law within New Zealand.

The case addressed the issue of whether seasonal plant work amounted to continuous employment or, as AFFCO argued, discontinuous employment with off-season workers classed as unemployed.

Eventually the meat processor was found to have unlawfully locked out workers when collective bargaining talks were still under way but the Talley’s-operated organization is appealing. 

“Despite 30 years of well-established law in New Zealand providing that seasonal workers are not employees in the off-season, the Employment Court overturned such established law and determined that employment is continuous,” a company representative told HRM.

“Given that the Employment Court’s decision goes against over 30 years of well-established law in New Zealand, and has serious consequences for the entire seasonal workforce in New Zealand, the judgment is under appeal,” he added.

More like this:

When can HR legally ask for a sick note?

Transgender worker claims constructive dismissal

Three must-have skills HR should borrow from marketing
 

Recent articles & video

Woolworths pleads guilty in $1.1 million wage underpayment case

Job ads decline by 0.4% in New Zealand in March

Thank you to the judges of the 2024 HRD Awards New Zealand

Is your flexible work arrangement diluting organisational culture?

Most Read Articles

Best practice for handling fixed-term agreements in New Zealand

Recap: Winners of the 2024 HRD Awards New Zealand

Cambridge business reports positive outcomes from 9-day fortnight